SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clarivate Analytics
Embase


European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry  —  Vol. 34, Issue Special Issue 4 (July 2026) ← Back to issue
📄 PDF

Enhancing Hand Trauma Diagnosis: Analysis of Cone Beam CT Versus Plain Radiography

DOI: 10.1922/ejprd.v34i4s.1456
Keywords

cone beam computed tomography; CBCT; scaphoid fracture; wrist trauma; hand trauma; radiography; fracture detection

Authors

Mohammad Ayasrah1,*
1 Department of Allied Medical Sciences,
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan
University of Science and Technology, Irbid
22110, Jordan
Aseel Bani Khaled1
1 Department of Allied Medical Sciences,
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan
University of Science and Technology, Irbid
22110, Jordan
* Correspondence: Mohammad Ayasrah,
PhD
Associate professor Department of Allied
Medical Sciences,
Faculty of Applied
Medical Sciences, Jordan University of
Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[email protected];
Tel.:
+962-27201000-26939

Received-20-05-2026
Revised-24-06-2026
Accepted-28-06-2026

EJPRD

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2026) 34(4S),286–294

Enhancing Hand Trauma
Diagnosis: Analysis of Cone
Beam CT Versus Plain
Radiography

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The detection of hand trauma, particularly scaphoid fractures, is challenging because of the intricate composition of the wrist bones. Standard radiography has recognized limitations and may fail to identify occult fractures at the initial presentation. This study compared the diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus plain radiography for suspected scaphoid and other wrist fractures in a preliminary exploratory cohort. Methods: This prospective, single-center exploratory study included a convenience sample of 31 patients with suspected hand and wrist injuries. After initial radiography, patients underwent CBCT. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed both image sets. The primary outcome was the comparative fracture detection rate between the two modalities. Results: CBCT demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield, identifying fractures in 20/31 patients (64.5%; 95% CI: 46.9%-78.9%) compared with 12/31 patients (38.7%; 95% CI: 23.7%-56.2%) by radiography. This difference was statistically significant (McNemar's test, p = 0.0078). CBCT identified eight fractures that were not detected by radiography and eliminated diagnostic ambiguity, with 0% of cases classified as suspicious compared with 12.9% for radiography. Conclusions: In this preliminary study, CBCT showed a higher diagnostic yield for occult hand and wrist fractures than plain radiography. These findings support the potential value of CBCT as a second-line imaging tool when clinical suspicion remains high despite negative or equivocal radiographs. Larger multi-center studies with a definitive reference standard are needed to confirm these findings. 1. Introduction Hand injuries are among the most frequently encountered cases in emergency departments, accounting for approximately 10 to 30% of injuries seen in such settings [1]. Radiography remains the primary imaging modality for diagnosing these injuries as it provides vital information for the initial management of patients [2]. Due to the hand’s pivotal role in both functional and social activities, injuries to this area require prompt and expert care [3]. The psychological burden caused by hand injuries, such as depression and anxiety, can significantly reduce a patient’s quality of life [4]. While simple radiographs can diagnose many hand and wrist injuries, certain cases, especially non-displaced fractures like scaphoid fractures, present diagnostic challenges. These fractures, which are often subtle and difficult to detect with standard radiographs, can lead to poor outcomes if not accurately diagnosed [5]. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ejprd.org- Published by Riset Publishing Services LLC.

Copyright © 2026 by Riset Publishing Services LLC

Article Information
Pages
286 – 294
Cover Date
July 2026
Volume
34
Issue
Special Issue 4
Print ISSN
0965-7452
Electronic ISSN
2396-8893