European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic

Abstract

Purpose/Aim: To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic. Material and methods: The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis. Results: The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification. Conclusion: Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of
enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.

Keywords
Polyethylene Glycol
Porcelain
Modeling Liquid

Authors

Marina Amaral, Tiago M. B. Campos, Talita Takahashi, Gabriely S. D. Moura, Gabriela F. Ramos, Renata M. D. Melo, Mutlu Özcan

Articles from this issue

Title / DOI Access Page Start Page End Purchase
Impact of Treatment with Unilateral Implant Supported Fixed Partial Prosthesis on the Frequency of Masticatory Side Switches in Patients with Unilateral Posterior Missing Teeth
10.1922/EJPRD_2336Khoury-Ribas07
no access 245 251 £10.00
Two-Year Survival of Ceramic Endocrowns and Partial Coverage Ceramic Restorations with Fiber Post: A 2-Year Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
10.1922/EJPRD_2374Morimoto10
no access 252 261 £10.00
Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic
10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05
no access 262 266 £10.00
Longevity of Resin Composite and Amalgam Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review
10.1922/EJPRD_2371Maciel09
no access 267 275 £10.00
Implant-Supported Extra-Orally Cemented Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study up to 18 Months in Function
10.1922/EJPRD_2029Cakan08
no access 276 283 £10.00
Direct Short-Fiber Reinforced Composite Resin Restorations and Glass-Ceramic Endocrowns in Endodontically Treated Molars: A 4 -Year Clinical Study free access 284 295 view
Clinical Performance of Complete-Arch ImplantSupported Rehabilitations Using Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Restorations Bonded to CAD/CAM Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks up to 5 Years
10.1922/EJPRD_2069Fabbri09
no access 296 304 £10.00
The Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions when Using and Varying the Material and Diameter of the Dental Implant Scan Bodies
10.1922/EJPRD_2367Althubaitiy09
no access 305 313 £10.00
  • free access Free Access
  • no access No Access
  • full access Full Access

Subscriptions